View non-flash version
High Speed Ferry Proposal For Long Island, N.Y. According to a report released in January by the Suffolk County, New York Budget Review Office (BRO), the legisla- ture is exploring plans to imple- ment a $76 million project that would connect Shoreham, Long Is- land and New Haven, Conn, via high-speed ferries across the Long Island Sound. The ferry prosposal originates from the need to find an alternate and more economically efficient mode of connecting New York and New England for trading purposes. The Long Island Sound Shuttle Limited Partnership (LISSLP), au- thors of the ferry proposal, submit- ted a theoretical cross-Sound ferry operational plan whereby two ves- sels would be constructed, each de- signed to cross in 30 minutes at a cruising speed in the 40-knot range—carrying people, cars and trucks. The proposed LISSLP ves- sel is the HM 780, to be designed by Hovermarine International, Ltd. The HM 780 will be propelled by four 7,000 hp diesel engines and two 14,000 hp waterjets. The ves- sel proportions would be 262 ft. (79.8 m) by 81.25 ft. (24.7 m), with a weight of 850 gt. The vessel's cruising speed is designed to be 40 knots, topping out at 60 knots. Although this vessel would be the first of its kind, some existing vessels meet most of the specifications of the HM 780. For example, Schichau Seebeckwerft's SSW 320 vessel, Stena's 407-ft. (124 m) catamaran, FBM Marine's 147.6- ft. (45 m) aluminum catamaran TriCat, Dutch yard Royal Schelde's 230-ft. (70 m) catamaran, Kvaerner Fjellstrand's 131-ft. (40 m) catama- ran (Flying Cat), and Westamarin's 50-knot FoilCat 3000. The esti- mated cost for each vessel is $24 million. The Budget Review Office's study estimated that losses would total $2.8 million for the first year, and after five years, would total $10.2 million. By the sixth year, there is a pre- dicted turnaround in net income and cumulative net would turn posi- tive in year nine. LISSLP financial projections es- timate they would stand to break even the first year, experience losses in the next two years, and absorb long-term profits of $15.8 million after 10 years. The cost of meeting environmen- tal standards has not been substan- tiated, although it has been esti- mated that extensive overhauling of the Shoreham dock configura- tion would not be necessary, since LISSLP's proposed vessels are sur- face vessels, not requiring exces- sive space for manueverability. Other projects, such as dredging channels, constructing jetties and breakwaters, and reducing shore- line erosion would also be consid- ered in the assessment of environ- mental costs. The conclusion of the Suffolk County Budget Review Office is that the project is economically feasible, but, like most ventures, would carry financial risks. The development of the ferry pro- posal has the potential to impact both the regional economy and trans- portation network. The Budget Re- view Office projected a net benefit for local Long Island communities due to the availability of lower cost goods from New England. Both Connecticut and New York would benefit from the additional transportation option, which would be aquired with no public outlay. In early February, the Suffolk County legislature voted down a resolution, discouraging the Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO), the owners of the proposed Shoreham site, from leasing the property to LISSLP for development of the project. Some of the legisla- tors appear to be concerned that the project will dip into public funds, and possibly require government subsidies. Ultimately, the ferry project has been designed to create jobs and open new markets, and to function solely on private funding. According to Budget Review Of- fice DirectorFred Pollert, the reso- lution was designed to direct LILCO, and is non-binding. The ferry pro- posal is not dead, and shuttle group investors are continuing negotia- tions with LILCO, while investigat- ing other sites for the ferry project's development. The details pertaining to the ferry proposal plan were obtained from the Suffolk County, New York legislature's Budget Review Office report, Review Of The Pro- posed High Speed Ferry Service Between Shoreham, New York & New Haven, Connecticut. FYI: BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY. ESCORT CAPABLE TUGS AQUAMASTER'S LATEST RESEARCH: An owner who desires a shiphandling or ocean tug with escort capability has the option to build either a stern-drive or a tractor tug — if Z-drives are chosen for propulsion. AQUAMASTER-RAUMA'S RESEARCH IN Z-DRIVES: Operating modes for escort tugs reveals four modes of operation, with profound implications for tugs operating in ports with narrow channels or built to perform multipur- pose tasks. For more information call AQUAMASTER-RAUMA, INC. 504-883-8340 Circle 204 on Reader Service Card North American Sensors Corp. The new leader in sensor and gauge rn technology for the Marine Industry 1 LEVEL MONITORING * magnetic-reed level sensors * pressure transmitters * ultrasonic sensors * LED to PC system monitoring PRESSURE MONITORING * pressure trans, and switches * pressure gauges * analog and digital signal monitoring TEMPERATURE MONITORING * temperature gauges * temperature switches * RTD's and thermocouples "FROM PARTS TO SYSTEMS, NASC IS YOUR BEST CHOICE FOR ALL MARINE SENSORS AND GAUGES" CALL 1-800-259-6874 FAX 504-893-0807 pa i±J For Tank Ships CargoRadai* Microwave Tank Level Gauge Guard Level® Independent High Level and Overflow Alarm Sensor Guard Level® HPT Series Hydrostatic Pressure Transmitter HPV Series High Velocity Pressure/Vacuum Relief Valve Please call or FAX for quotation. Ian-Conrad Bergan, Inc. Bergan Tank Control7" 3409 Gulf Breeze Parkway Gulf Breeze, FL 32561 USA Phone (904) 932-9388 • Fax (904) 932-0504 March, 1995 Circle 317 on Reader Service Card Circle 239 on Reader Service Card 91
