View non-flash version
Navy Update Exhibit 1 Navy Shipbuilding And Conversion Budget FY 1985 (in millions of dollars) Original Budget Request Amended Budget Request House Authorization Senate Authorization Qty Amt Qty Amt Qty Amt Qty Amt Trident2 1 1755.0 1 1775.0 1 1755.0' 1 1755.0 TAK 1 91.1 SSN-6882 4 2880.0 3 2160.0 4 2880.0 4 2880.0 BB 1 422.6 1 422.6' 1 336.21 1 422.6' CV SLEP2 1 764.5 1 764,5 1 764.5 1 764.5 CG-47? 3 3150.0 3 3150.0 3 3150.0 3 3150.0 DDG-51 1 1173.4 1 1173.4 1 1173.9 1 1173.4 LSD-412 2 489.5 2 489.5 2 489.5 2 489.5 LHD-12 39.2 39.2 39.2 39.2 LPD-42 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 MCM 4 349.5 4 349.5 4 349.5 4 349.5 TAO 3 562.6 3 562.6 3 562.6 3 562.6 TAG0S 3 192.9 3 192.9 2 129.9 2 128.4 TAGS 2 245.0 2 245.0 2 245.0 2 245.0 TAVB2 1 42.8 1 42.8 1 42.8 1 42.8 TACS 2 44.0 2 44.0 2 44.0 2 44.0 LCAC2 9 230.1 9 230.1 9 230.1 9 230.1 Landing Craft3 11.9 11.9 11.9 11.9 Service Craft4 81.2 81.2 81.2 81.2 Strategic Crafts 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Outfitting 204.4 204.4 204.4 204.4 Post Delivery 179.2 179.2 179.2 179.2 Potential Cost Growth 187.0 Repricing6 (150.0) (150.0) (175.0) Contract Supp. (3.5) (3.5) Total 13,141.9 12,010.3 12,564.9 12,620.8 Number of Ships7 29 27 27 27 Exhibit 2 Navy Ships on Order or Authorized (as of 15 June 1984) Dates Dates Ship Yard Construction Start Delivery Ship Yard Construction Start Delivery TAGOS 2 Tacoma 8/82 7'84 FFG 61 * 9/88 TAGOS 3 Tacoma 11/82 11/84 LHD 1 Ingalls 8/84 3/89 TAGOS 4 Tacoma 2'83 3/85 LSD 41 Lockheed 4 81 11 84 TAGOS 5 Tacoma 5 83 6 85 LSD 42 Lockheed 4/82 10 85 TAGOS 6 Tacoma 5/84 10/85 LSD 43 Lockheed 2/83 6/87 TAGOS 7 Tacoma 7 84 11 85 LSD 44 Avondale 7/85 2 88 TAGOS 8 Tacoma 9/84 1/86 MCM 1 Peterson 1 83 9 85 TAGOS 9 Tacoma 11/84 4/86 MCM 2 Marinette 10 83 8 86 TAGOS 10 Tacoma 2/85 6/86 MCM 3 Peterson 4/84 6 86 TAGOS 11 Tacoma 4 85 8/86 MCM 4 Marinette 4 84 7 86 TAGOS 12 Tacoma 7 85 11/86 MCM 5 Peterson 9 84 10 86 TAO 187 Avondale 4 84 9 86 MSH 1 * 8/87 TAO 188 Avondale 8-84 1/87 SSBN 730 GD-Elec. Boat 2/78 9 84 TAO 189 Avondale 2/85 5/87 SSBN 731 GD-Elec. Boat 4 79 6/85 TAO 190 Avondale 7/85 9/87 SSBN 732 GD-Elec. Boat 10/79 2/86 ARS 50 Peterson 5'82 2/85 SSBN 733 GD-Elec. Boat 2/81 10 86 ARS 51 Peterson 11 82 6 85 SSBN 734 GD-Elec. Boat 1 82 12 88 ARS 52 Peterson 1/83 8/85 SSBN 735 GD-Elec. Boat 12/82 8/89 ARS 53 Peterson 10/83 11 85 SSBN 736 GD-Elec. Boat 11/83 4/90 CG 48 Ingalls 7 <81 7 84 SSN 709 GD-Elec. Boat 5/78 6/84 CG 49 Ingalls 4/82 7/85 SSN 710 GD-Elec. Boat 3/79 2 85 CG 50 Ingalls 9'82 1/86 SSN 717 Newport News 4 79 8/84 CG 51 Bath 11/83 1/87 SSN 718 Newport News 2 80 12 84 CG 52 Ingalls 7/83 7 86 SSN 719 GD-Elec. Boat 1 80 6 85 CG 53 Ingalls 2 84 2/87 SSN 720 GD-Elec. Boat 7 80 11/85 CG 54 Ingalls 7/84 6/87 SSN 721 Newport News 9/81 3 86 CG 55 Ingalls 11/84 10/87 SSN 722 Newport News 11/81 9 86 CG 56 Ingalls 3/85 2 88 SSN 723 Newport News 11/81 3/87 CG 57 Ingalls 7/85 5/88 SSN 724 GD-Elec. Boat 3/82 5/87 CG 58 Bath 9/85 9/89 SSN 725 GD-Elec. Boat 12,82 10/87 CG 59 Ingalls 12/85 11/88 SSN 750 Newport News 8 82 5 87 CVN 71 Newport News 10/80 12/86 SSN 751 GD-Elec. Boat 6/83 11/87 CVN 72 Newport News 2/83 12/89 SSN 752 GD-Elec. Boat 9 83 3 88 CVN 73 Newport News 2/83 12/91 SSN 753 Newport News 9 83 5/88 FFG 46 Todd 10/81 6/84 SSN 754 GD-Elec. Boat 7 88 FFG 48 Todd 3/81 11/84 SSN 755 GD-Elec. Boat 12 88 FFG 49 Bath 5/82 6/84 TAH 19 NASSCO 10/84 1086 FFG 50 Bath 10/82 10/84 TAH 20 NASSCO 7 85 787 FFG 51 Todd 5/82 10/84 TAKR 287 NASSCO 1 83 6 84 FFG 52 Todd 12/81 7/85 TAKR 288 NASSCO 5/83 10 84 FFG 53 Bath 2/83 1/85 TAKR 289 PennShip 5/83 10 85 FFG 54 Todd 9/82 4/85 TAKR 290 Avondale 10/84 3/86 FFG 55 Bath 4/83 4/85 TAKR 291 Avondale 7/84 11 85 FFG 56 Bath 8 83 8/85 TAKR 292 NASSCO 6 84 1085 FFG 57 Todd 1/83 12/85 TAKR 293 PennShip 1082 6/84 FFG 58 Bath 11/83 11/85 TAKR 294 Avondale 10/82 7/84 FFG 59 Bath 3/84 12/86 CV 59 Phila. N.S. 1/83 5/85 FFG 60 Todd 3/84 10/86 1. Includes transfer of funds from prior year programs 2. Includes advanced procurement 3. Includes 3 LCM-8's, 2 LCM-6 s and 2 LCU's 4. Includes 10 open lighters (VC), 3 floating cranes (YD). 6 covered lighters (YFN), 7 patrol craft (VP) and 6 harbor tugs (YTB) 5 Provides for purchase of commercial ships to be placed in reserve fleet 6. Reductions based on favorable contract awards, particularly GFE for the CG-47 class cruiser 7. LCAC's not included in quantity total Source: House and Senate Defense Authorization Reports (H.R 98-691 and S. 98-500) (continued from page 46) Senate Recommended T-AO 187 Program Be Opened To Second Source Competition Senate Armed Services Commit- tee recommended that the Navy seriously consider establishing a second source for the TAO fleet oiler program. Avondale has re- ceived contracts for four of these ships. Three are authorized for FY 1985. According to NAVSEA, Navy's plan is to open the next flight of T-AO's to industrywide competition. Senate Recommended Engines Be Competed In Future T-AO's Colt-Pielstick was chosen to supply diesel prime movers for the first four T-AO fleet oilers. The Senate Armed Services Committee has recommended that Navy seek to compete the engine contract for follow-on requirements. This com- petition is to be held within "the funding constraints that exist within current Navy planning for follow-on engines." Allis-Chal- mers—M.A.N./B&W diesel and DeLaval-Stork Werkspoor were the two competitors to Colt-Pielstick in the original T-AO engine competition. According to NAVSEA, Navy will require that competing en- gines be manufactured in this country. This will present diffi- culty to diesel manufacturers wishing to compete—as Colt has already received a sizable technol- ogy transfer grant to tool up for domestic manufacture. Other com- panies will need to make an in- vestment in facilities. Seems unfair! House Cancelled FFG Funded Last Year And Reprogrammed Funds For FY 1985 Trident Procurement The House Committee recom- mended cancellation of the FFG frigate placed in the SCN procure- ment program by Congress last year (see IMA's first update—ex- cerpted November 15, 1983 MR/ EN). Funds previously appropri- ated ($300 million) would be transferred to the FY 1985 Tri- dent program. Navy had advised the Committee that the FFG with improvements specified for the FY 1984 ship would cost $473 mil- lion—$173 million over the origi- nal estimate. This action was not taken by Senate and the subject will be taken up by conferees. Todd in its 1 April 1984 Annual Report states "the Los Angeles Di- vision expects to receive a contract shortly for an additional FFG . . ." This contract is projected to add $100 million to Todd's backlog. Cancellation of the ship will hurt! Provision For Cost Growth In FY 1985 Procurement Has Been Eliminated The original Administration budget request provided $187 for potential cost growth to offset pro- gram cost increases beyond Navy control. Both House and Senate eliminated this budget item. The Administration also eliminated it from the amended request in May. Reason given for this action is the continuing success in staying within budget. House And Senate Conferees Have Been Meeting To Work Out Differences Between The Two Bills For ship procurement the differ- ence between the House and Sen- ate authorization bills are rela- tively minor: • Senate has authorized more funds than House for BB 63 Missouri reactivation • There is a small difference in funding level for the 2 T- AGOS's • Senate added $25 million to repricing and deleted $3.5 million in contractor support • House has cancelled FFG au- thorized in FY 1984 and transferred funds to Trident program; Senate has not taken this action The conference report will be sent to both House and Senate for vote, presumably before Congress ad- journs for July recess. 2. DEVELOPMENTS IN SHIPBUILDING PROGRAM As of June 1984 only two FY Program Exhibit 3 Contractors For FY 1985 Ships Contractor *Authorized but not on contract Source: Navy Trident SSN-688 BB CV SLEP CG-47 DDG-51 LSD-41 LHD-1 LPD-4 MCM T-AO T-AGOS T-AGS T-AVB T-ACS LCAC GD-Electric Boat GD-Electric Boat, Newport News will share awards Long Beach Naval Yard Philadelphia Naval Yard Ingalls, Bath will share awards Ingalls, Bath, Todd-L.A. are competing for lead ship Avondale Ingalls Will be competed Peterson, Marinette will share awards Avondale current builder, but next flight will be competed Tacoma current builder, but next flight will be competed Will be competed Todd-Galveston Bay Shipbuilding did first conversion, but next contract will be competed Bell Halter lead yard, but one boat in FY 1985 program will probably be second sourced 48 Maritime Reporter/Engineering News
