Navy Overhaul Market
Exhibit 5
Overhaul Contracting Profile By Type Ship
(regular overhauls only)
Fiscal Year
Cruisers/destroyers
Number of overhauls
1984
5
1985
6
1986
4
Competing limits
coastwide bids
homeport areas only
5 6 4
Type contract awarded
fixed price incentive
CPAF 5
3
3
4
Type procurement used
RFP-2P
FSS/MSS/NSS 5
3
3
3
1
Frigates
Number of overhauls 9 3 _
Competing limits
coastwide bids
homeport areas only
7
2
3 -
Type contract awarded
fixed price
CPAF
CPFF
6
2
1
3 -
Type procurement used
IFB
RFP-2P
FSS/MSS/NSS
6
3
1
2
-
Amphibious
Number of overhauls 7 9 3
Competing limits
coastwide bids
homeport areas only
5
2
5
4
3
Type contract awarded
fixed price
CPAF
CPFF
4
1
2
8
1
3
Type procurement used
IFB
RFP-1P
RFP-2P
FSS/MSS/NSS
4
3
7
1
1
2
1
Support
Number of overhauls
Competing limits
coastwide bids
homeport areas only
4
1
3
8
5
3
6
6
Type contract awarded
fixed price 4 8 6
Type procurement used
IFB
RFP-1P
RFP-2P
3
1
4
3
1
5
1
Submarines
Number of overhauls _ 2 _
Competing limits - N/A -
Type contract awarded - TBD -
Type procurement used
Sole _ 2 _
Minesweepers/Patrol Hydro-
foil
Number of overhauls 1 3 1
Competing limits
coastwide bids
homeport areas only 1 3 1
Type contract awarded
fixed price 1 3 1
Type procurement used
IFB
RFP-1P
1
3
1
Aircraft Carrier
Number of overhauls _ _ 1
Competing limits - - N/A
Type contract awarded - - TBD
Type procurement used
Sole - - 1
(continued from page 27)
quest, the Department has sought
funding totaling $36 million to
open two new ports, one to sup-
port a battleship surface action
group at Staten Island, NY, and
one for a carrier battle group at
Everett, WA. The total military
construction cost of facilities for
these two ports is estimated at
$750 million. However, a substan-
tial part of these funds would be
required to homeport these new
ships whether new or existing
ports are used.
The committee has approved the
initial projects requested for both
of these facilities, subject to a
requirement that no funds autho-
rized to be appropriated in this
act for naval strategic homeport-
ing may be obligated or expended
until 90 days have elapsed follow-
ing the submission of a report to
the Congress by the Secretary of
the Navy justifying the expendi-
tures of such funds on the basis of
military necessity and cost effec-
tiveness.
INDUSTRY ACTIVITY
Navy continues to be the domi-
nant source of shipyard business in
this country. Commercial work is
depressed due to the strong dollar
and poor economic conditions in
international and domestic ship-
ping. Most U.S. ship repair yards
are relying on Navy contracts for
their business base.
Navy Contract Awards
Major Navy contract awards over
the past three months are described
below:
• Todd Shipyards—An $11.5 mil-
lion fixed price contract was
awarded the San Francisco divi-
sion to overhaul the ammunition
ship Mt. Hood (AE-29). Todd was
one of five bidders. The San Pedro
division received a $3.5 million
fixed price contract to perform
SRA work on the destroyer Paul
Foster (DD 964). It was one of two
bidders.
• Boston Shipyard—The firm re-
ceived a $5.0 million fixed price
contract from the Military Sealift
Command to overhaul the fleet
oiler Mississinewa (TAO 143).
Boston Shipyard was one of eight
firms that bid the job.
• Southwest Marine—The San Pe-
dro division received a $14.9 mil-
lion contract to overhaul the am-
phibious landing ship Mt. Vernon
(LSD 39). Two firms competed for
this contract.
• Continental Maritime (San Die-
go)—A $7.5 million fixed price
contract was received to overhaul
the frigate Roark (FF 1053). Con-
tinental was one of six firms com-
peting for the contract.
• NASSCO—The firm was awarded
a $12.8 million fixed price contract
to overhaul the amphibious as-
sault ship Tripoli (LPH 10). Two
companies competed for this job.
A $6.0 million fixed price contract
for SRA work on the destroyer
Merrill (DD 976) was awarded to
NASSCO. Three firms competed
for the work. NASSCO also re-
ceived a $3.5 cost plus award fee
contract for phased maintenance
of four tank landing ships. Two
firms competed for this job.
• Service Engineering—This San
Francisco firm received a $4.2 mil-
lion cost plus award fee contract
for phased maintenance of four
Kilauea-class ammunition ships:
Kiska (AE 35), Shasta (AE 33),
Mt. Hood (AE 29) and Flint (AE
32). Five firms competed for this
contract.
• Braswell-Hoboken—The yard re-
ceived a $7.6 million fixed price
contract to overhaul the frigate
McCloy (FF 1038). Work is to be
performed by its Hoboken divi-
sion. Seven firms competed for
this contract. Boston Shipyard
was low bidder at $5.8 million but,
according to the Navy contracting
office, was "determined to be non-
responsible."
• Litton-Ingalls—A $12.0 million
fixed price incentive contract was
awarded to overhaul the destroyer
Preble (DDG 46). Litton was one
of five firms competing for this
contract.
• Burrard Yarrows—This Canadian
firm was awarded a $3.0 million
fixed price contract for work on
the combat stores ship Spica
(TAFS 9). The firm was one of six
companies who competed for the
job.
• Alabama Dry Dock—The firm re-
ceived an $8.8 million fixed price
contract to overhaul and upgrade
the combat stores ship Saturn
(TAFS 10). Ten firms competed
for this contract.
PROJECTED NAVY SHIP
MAINTENANCE
In May Navy released its 1985-86
schedule of ship maintenance to be
performed in commercial yards. It
shows the dramatic change in over-
haul scheduling which results from
the shift to engineered operating
cycle and phased maintenance.
International Maritime Associates, Inc. (IMA) provides systematic cov-
erage of the Navy ship maintenance and modernization market. Subscrib-
ers to IMA's unique Navy ship maintenance reporting service receive
quarterly updates and special memos which systematically report impor-
tant business developments. Included in the reports are projected repair
work, contract awards, industry developments, policy changes, legislation,
etc. information is up-to-date, the analysis concise. The reports are
designed for use by marketing managers and business planners.
This service can be obtained for $380.00 to cover the period July 1985
through June 1986. To order please contact: International Maritime Asso-
ciates, Inc., 1800 K Street N. W., Washington, D.C. 20006; Telephone (202)
296-4615; Telecopier (202) 293-7508; Telex 64325 IMA.
28 Maritime Reporter/Engineering News
Digital Wave Publishing