by Stephen D. Harris, PE
Elliott Bay Design Group
Historically, repairing corrosion dam-
age on sizable drydocks has been a time
consuming and often costly effort. Emerg-
ing technologies have made the job easier
and less expensive, while providing a
more accurate picture of the issue at hand
and offering repair and maintenance feed-
back superior to that obtained through
conventional practices.
Current finite element analysis (FEA)
technology allows engineers to more effi-
ciently assess a drydock structure, deter-
mine the extent of corrosion damage,
identify repairs needed and develop a
repair plan. This information is then gath-
ered to identify and streamline future
maintenance requirements.
The Initial Process
Initial steps to take when performing an
FEA on a large floating drydock include
establishing open communication
between the engineering team and the
operations/maintenance team to assure a
smooth flow of information for the assess-
ment.
Next, existing as-built drawings should
be located, or, if unavailable, a detailed
structural survey must be conducted to
verify the existing structures. Original
scantling thicknesses are required to pro-
vide a baseline condition of the original
design. Design loading should be defined
early on to provide a basis for the analy-
sis.
Original as-built scantlings must be
carefully analyzed to determine what
structures are considered critical. These
critical areas may require more attention
during the gauging survey, which will
measure the condition of all structures to
be included in the resulting finite element
model (FEM.)
Such thorough initial analyses will pro-
vide a better understanding of the drydock
and identify critical structural elements
that require particular attention.
Inputting the Data
Incorporating a detailed gauging report
into a large FEM can be a tedious and
time-consuming task if not carefully man-
aged. To simplify the task, each structural
scantling type is separated into three to
four wastage ranges to reduce the number
of section properties.
Each member of the model is redefined
with a section property corresponding to
the measured thickness range. This is
repeated throughout the structure until the
model reflects the measurements in the
gauging report. With the advent of more
automated gauging instruments, it is pos-
sible to automate the gauging mapping
directly to the FEM.
Final design loads are obtained to
reflect the current operations and applied
to the boundary as gauged scantling FEM.
The design loads should be reviewed to
ensure that a balanced condition is applied
to the as-gauged scantling FEM. The
FEM solution is then performed for the
as-gauged model with the appropriate
design loads.
The solution process can become quite
involved if the model is significant in
magnitude. Careful planning of the model
size is important to meet the needs of the
maintenance team.
The critical areas of concern, identified
in the initial analysis, are reviewed for
compliance against the given criteria.
Each member failing the given criteria is
tracked in a repair matrix.
The results of the analysis are reviewed
to confirm the behavior of the FEM under
the intended design loads. Once the struc-
tural behavior is acceptable, the model is
reviewed in more detail.
Once the FEM is updated, it can then be
easily revised in the future to reflect addi-
tional gauging data, renewals or repairs.
Existing or new design load conditions
can be applied to the model to determine
if any additional structural maintenance is
required to provide the necessary strength.
This process provides a more cost-effec-
tive approach of managing the mainte-
nance by repairing only areas with inade-
quate strength.
Pre-planning Efforts
A number of measures can be taken to
August, 2005 • MarineNews 25
MARINE ENGINEERING
Drydock Corrosion Strength Analysis
Emerging Technology Offers More Accurate Results
Drydock Deflection Results
Drydock Pontoon Cross Section
AUGUSTMN2005 4(25-32).qxd 8/1/2005 4:44 PM Page 25
Digital Wave Publishing