By Jonathan K. Waldron
For as many problems people have
operating the myriad of technological
gadgets they collect - from Blackberries
to cell phones to personal computers - the
world is generally better off with techno-
logical innovation. And although human
technological inventions have often pro-
duced harmful byproducts such as pollu-
tion, in recent years scientists and engi-
neers have focused their attention on
leveraging technology to cure environ-
mental problems. The Marine Environ-
mental Protection Committee ("MEPC")
of the International Maritime Organiza-
tion ("IMO") recently made a move to fill
a much-needed technological gap when it
issued a resolution to improve pollution
prevention equipment used aboard ships.
Specifically, resolution MEPC.107(49)
was published on July 18, 2003, to
enhance existing oily water monitor and
separator performance and testing stan-
dards due to recent advances in system
technology. The resolution provides a
uniform interpretation in determining
appropriate design, construction, and
operational parameters for pollution pre-
vention equipment when such equipment
is fitted to new ships of greater than 400
gross tons and when new systems are fit-
ted to existing ships of greater than 400
gross tons. The resolution became effec-
tive as guidelines for new equipment
installed on new and existing ships on
January 1, 2005. Ultimately, Resolution
MEPC.107(49) will be officially adopted
as a standard as part of the new revisions
to MARPOL Annex I scheduled to be
effective January 1, 2007.
The specifications call for a bilge sepa-
rator that can produce effluent with an oil
content of less than 15 parts per million
("ppm"), a bilge alarm to alert operators
when limits have been exceeded and
appropriate automatic stopping devices to
prevent effluent that exceeds the 15 ppm
limit from being discharged overboard.
Although the 15 ppm effluent standard
has not changed, the new equipment
called for in the resolution is better
designed to handle emulsions, solvents,
and surfactants, which were difficult at
best to handle with older technology.
The Coast Guard issued Policy Letter
04-13, Revision 1, on March 24, 2005, to
alert the industry of the IMO resolution
and provide interim guidance for inspec-
tion and testing procedures of oily water
separators and monitoring systems meet-
ing MEPC.107(49). Until regulations are
adopted, the Coast Guard will rely on the
Policy Letter during regularly scheduled
inspections of oily water monitor and sep-
arator systems on U.S.-flag vessels and
Port State Control examinations of for-
eign vessels. The Coast Guard intends to
publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
in the near future to incorporate the new
performance and testing procedures of
Resolution MEPC.107(49) into U.S. regu-
lations. The Policy Letter makes it clear
that compliance with Resolution
MEPC.107(49) is optional until entry into
force of the MARPOL Annex I amend-
ments. In essence, the Policy Letter pro-
vides a checklist for Coast Guard marine
safety personnel to carry out inspections
of U.S. and foreign-flag vessels. The
checklist includes: (1) verification that
the oily water separator and oily water
monitor/bilge alarm have been approved
by the Coast Guard or appropriate Admin-
istration; (2) conduct a cursory review of
15-ppm bilge monitoring/alarm records;
and (3) verification of the accuracy of the
15-ppm oily water monitors or bilge
alarms completed by an authorized equip-
ment testing company at each Internation-
al Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate
renewal. There is one major problem with
the way MEPC.107(49) is written with
regard to implementation of these require-
ments for existing vessels. The resolution
states that the provisions are effective for
installations fitted to new ships and for
"new installations" on already built ships
"in so far as is reasonable and practica-
ble." However, with regard to new sys-
tems installed on existing vessels, it is
unclear how much of a new system must
be installed in order to trigger the require-
ments of MEPC.107(49). In other words,
if only parts of an oily water monitor or
separator are replaced, are the require-
ments triggered? If not, which parts, or
how many parts, can be replaced without
forcing a complete replacement? Can
maintenance personnel forever replace
parts piecemeal, even when a complete
replacement is needed, in order to prevent
the expense of a whole new system?
These are questions that must be carefully
considered, and commented upon when
the Coast Guard initiates its rulemaking
on these new requirements.
In conclusion, owners, operators, man-
ufacturers and interested parties should
monitor the Coast Guard's rulemaking
implementing Resolution MEPC.107(49)
to determine if U.S.-flag vessels will be
required to comply with Resolution
MEPC.107(49) earlier than January 1,
2007. In addition, owners and operators
of existing vessels and manufacturers of
equipment should monitor IMO imple-
mentation of Resolution MEPC.107(49),
including developments regarding the
interpretation of the meaning of "replace-
ment," as related to when new equipment
conforming to Resolution MEPC.107(49)
must be installed.
14 • MarineNews • August, 2005
LEGAL BEAT
Better Pollution Prevention Equipment Will Soon
Become Mandatory: But Exactly When and How?
! , T R U O # E T T I F A ,
,
E T
5 S
" R I
N G &